Skip to content
Menu
To Spo World
  • Business
    • Business Idea
    • Business News
    • Economy Creative
    • Online Marketing
    • Real Estate
  • Finance
    • Financial News
    • Gold Investment
    • Life Insurance
    • Stock Market News
    • Taxact
  • Lifestyle
    • Beauty
    • Fashion and Stylish
    • Health and Fitness
    • Lifestyle Magazine
  • Technology
    • New Technology
    • SEO Networking
    • Tech News
    • Technology Current Event
    • VPS Hosting
  • Travel
    • Family Tour
    • Holiday Types
    • Hotel and Car Rental
    • Marine Tourism
    • Travel Destination
  • World News
    • Breaking News
    • Fox News
    • Google News
    • News Today
    • Politics & Economy
To Spo World

Judge rejects Purdue Pharma’s opioid settlement over protections for Sackler family

Posted on December 21, 2021December 20, 2021

A judge has rejected OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy settlement of thousands of lawsuits over the opioid epidemic because of a provision that would protect members of the Sackler family from facing litigation of their own.

In a ruling Thursday, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon in New York found that federal bankruptcy law does not give the bankruptcy judge who had accepted the plan the authority to grant that kind of release for people who are not declaring bankruptcy themselves.

The ruling is likely to be appealed by the company, family members and the thousands of government entities that support the plan.

A Purdue spokesperson said Thursday evening that the company was preparing a statement. Representatives of the two branches of the family who own the company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, who was among a handful of state officials seeking to have the deal undone, called the ruling “a seismic victory for justice and accountability.” Tong said the ruling will “re-open the deeply flawed Purdue bankruptcy and force the Sackler family to confront the pain and devastation they have caused.”

Purdue sought bankruptcy protection in 2019 as it faced thousands of lawsuits claiming the company pushed doctors to prescribe OxyContin, helping spark an opioid crisis that has been linked to more than 500,000 deaths in the U.S. over the last two decades.

Through the bankruptcy court, it worked out a deal with its creditors. Members of the Sackler family would give up ownership of the company, which would transform into a different kind of entity that would still sell opioids — but with profits being used to fight the crisis. It would also develop new anti-addiction and anti-overdose drugs and provide them at little or no cost.

Sackler family members also would contribute $4.5 billion in cash and charitable assets as part of an overall deal that could be worth $10 billion, including the value of the new drugs, if they’re brought to market.

Government entities and businesses agreed to use any money they receive fighting the opioid epidemic. The deal also calls for millions of company documents, including communications with lawyers, to be made public.

In return, members of the wealthy family would get protection from lawsuits over their role in the opioid crisis — both the 860 already filed and any others in the future.

Most state and local governments, Native American tribes, individual opioid victims and others who voted said the plan worked out in the bankruptcy court should be accepted.

But the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee’s office, eight state attorneys general and some other entities have been fighting the deal. They argue that it does not properly hold members of the Sackler family accountable and that it usurps states’ ability to try to do so.

A bankruptcy court judge approved the plan over the objections in September. But the opponents appealed to McMahon’s court.

The main issue on the appeal was the lawfulness of the measures that would extend legal protections to family members.

Such “third-party releases” are not used in most bankruptcy cases, but they are common in cases such as Purdue’s, in which the companies involved are burdened with lawsuits and have relatively little value — but their wealthy owners could contribute.

The Purdue deal would not protect family members from any criminal charges. But so far none have been filed, and there are no signs that any are forthcoming, though some activists are calling for charges.

In a hearing, McMahon focused in on how Sackler family members transferred $10.4 billion from the privately held Stamford, Connecticut-based company over the decade before the bankruptcy. McMahon wanted to know whether the money was moved in part to ensure a role for the Sacklers in bankruptcy negotiations.

But in her ruling Thursday, McMahon focused on whether the bankruptcy law allows releases for third parties when some creditors in the bankruptcy disagree. She also noted that other courts will weigh in on the case.

“This opinion will not be the last word on the subject, nor should it be. This issue has hovered over bankruptcy law for thirty-five years,” she said.

NAVIGATION

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

Recent Posts

  • Need More Business Leads? Check Out These Great Tips!
  • Enhance Your Mobile Marketing With These Ideas
  • SEO Matters: Take Your Content To The Next Level
  • Email Marketing Doesn’t Have To Be Tricky
  • Want More Out Of Your Online Marketing? Try These Tips!

Categories

  • Beauty
  • Beauty
  • Breaking News
  • Breaking News
  • Business Idea
  • Business News
  • Business News
  • Economy Creative
  • Family Tour
  • Family Tour
  • Fashion and Stylish
  • Fashion and Stylish
  • Financial News
  • Fox News
  • General Article
  • Gold Investment
  • Google News
  • Health and Fitness
  • Holiday Types
  • Hotel and Car Rental
  • Life Insurance
  • Lifestyle Magazine
  • Marine Tourism
  • New News
  • New Technology
  • News
  • News Today
  • News Today
  • Online Marketing
  • Real Estate
  • SEO Networking
  • Stock Market News
  • Taxact
  • Tech News
  • Technology Current Event
  • Travel Destination
  • VPS Hosting

CALENDAR

January 2023
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Dec    

Partner links

If you are looking for legal and attorney information please visit this site --> hotcanadianphamracy.com
©2023 To Spo World | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com